Is apparently the title of a new book by John Sutherland and Deirdre LeFaye.  Here are some questions from it.  I had a little trouble with question #3, the answer to which proves Mrs. Gould (11th grade English) wrong in her claim that the French Revolution & Napoleonic Wars had nothing to do with Jane Austen.  (Bitter, me?  Still?  Perish the thought.)
I'm not sure yet if I want to read The Annotated Pride and Prejudice.  I usually insist on scholarly editions of texts when I teach Victorian literature, and I find the notes in Penguin, Broadview, or Oxford Classics editions useful.  Norton Criticals usually get a little too interpretive for me, and I fear--based on the article--that this new Pride and Prejudice would as well. 
By the way, the Times writer who thinks Dickens doesn't attract the same cultish devotion as Austen has never been to a Dickens Universe.  As a grad student there I was amazed by the folks we called "the postilion people" whose every question was about various modes of transportation, distances between coaching inns, etc.  Just as obsessive as the Jane-ites, believe me.
Musings on children's and YA literature, the academy, and the relationship between them, from an English professor and mother.
Friday, March 16, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment